CO129-342 - Governor Lugard & Public Offices - 1907 [11-12] — Page 152

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

No compensation will be given if the loss could have been avoided by the exercise of prudence. Loss by accident of property which might have been insured can give no claim to compensation. There are, however, cases in which reasonable prudence does not demand insurance, e.g. for the minimum of personal baggage taken by an Officer with him on a journey. Compensation will not be considered in the case of property which was not, at the time and place in question, actually or conventionally necessary for the discharge of the duties and the maintenance of the position of the Officer. Articles of an extraordinary or fanciful character, acquired for the gratification of private tastes must be kept at private risk. Only a part of the declared value of the property lost will, as a rule, be granted, to guard against the possibility of carelessness, and the danger that loss might become positively a source of profit. The usual Treasury principle has been to give two-thirds of the value, though the whole amount has on rare occasions been allowed when the total is very small, or in view of special circumstances, such as the efforts of an Officer to save public property at the risk of his own. No claim will be admitted on account of the loss of money which is the private property of individuals.

Edit History

2026-06-05 18:21:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
No compensation will be given if the loss could have been avoided by the exercise of prudence. Loss by accident of property which might have been insured can give no claim to compensation. There are, however, cases in which reasonable prudence does not demand insurance, e.g. for the minimum of personal baggage taken by an Officer with him on a journey. Compensation will not be considered in the case of property which was not, at the time and place in question, actually or conventionally necessary for the discharge of the duties and the maintenance of the position of the Officer. Articles of an extraordinary or fanciful character, acquired for the gratification of private tastes must be kept at private risk. Only a part of the declared value of the property lost will, as a rule, be granted, to guard against the possibility of carelessness, and the danger that loss might become positively a source of profit. The usual Treasury principle has been to give two-thirds of the value, though the whole amount has on rare occasions been allowed when the total is very small, or in view of special circumstances, such as the efforts of an Officer to save public property at the risk of his own. No claim will be admitted on account of the loss of money which is the private property of individuals.
Baseline (Original)
} REC c. o. 1600 149 Red 15 JAN 08 No compensation will be given if the loss could have been avoided by the exercise of prudence. Loss by accident of property which might have been insured can give no claim to compensation. There are, however, cases in which reason- able prudence does not demand insurance, e.g. for the minimum of personal baggage taken by an Officer with him on a journey. Compensation will not be considřed in the case of property which was not, at the time and place in question, actually or conventionally necessary for the discharge of the duties and the maintenance of the position of the Officer. Articles of an extraordinary or fanciful character, acquired for the gratification of private tastes must be kept at private risk. Only a part of the declared value of the property lost will, as a rule, be granted, to guard against the possibility of carelessness, and the danger that loss might become positively a source of pro- fit. The usual Treasury principle has been to give two- thirds of the value, though the whole amount has on rare occasions been allowed when the total is very small, or in view of special circumstances, such as the efforts of an Officer to save public property at the risk of his own. No claim will be admitted on account of the loss of money which is the private property of individuals. ! LS
2026-06-05 18:21:25 · Baseline
View content

}

REC

c. o.

1600

149

Red 15 JAN 08

No compensation will be given if the loss could have

been avoided by the exercise of prudence. Loss by accident

of property which might have been insured can give no claim

to compensation. There are, however, cases in which reason-

able prudence does not demand insurance, e.g. for the

minimum of personal baggage taken by an Officer with him

on a journey. Compensation will not be considřed in the

case of property which was not, at the time and place in

question, actually or conventionally necessary for the

discharge of the duties and the maintenance of the position

of the Officer. Articles of an extraordinary or fanciful

character, acquired for the gratification of private tastes

must be kept at private risk. Only a part of the declared

value of the property lost will, as a rule, be granted, to

guard against the possibility of carelessness, and the

danger that loss might become positively a source of pro-

fit. The usual Treasury principle has been to give two-

thirds of the value, though the whole amount has on rare

occasions been allowed when the total is very small, or in

view of special circumstances, such as the efforts of an

Officer to save public property at the risk of his own.

No claim will be admitted on account of the loss of money

which is the private property of individuals.

!

LS

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.